<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel>
<title>Fleezle</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:26:14 -0400</pubDate>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/</link>
<description>Rants-R-Us</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<webMaster>oneil&#108;&#064;&#111;inc.net</webMaster>
<item>
<title>Retro TV is da bomb</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article42.html</link>
<description>I can't tell you how thrilled I am about the relatively new Retro Television Network. As a kid growing up in the 70s and 80s, I was glued to the TV watching such &quot;reality&quot; shows as Emergency! and Adam-12...</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:26:14 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What are french fries, really?</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article41.html</link>
<description>Just had a discussion about french fries. I am of the following opinion, which I have long held:

Fries are nothing more than edible utensils for condiments. As such, surface area is the most important aspect. Steak fries have a lower surface area to volume ratio, and therefore are not as useful. There is less for the condiments to stick to.

And condiments are defined as salt, ketchup and grease (preferably of the oft-banned trans fat variety). I'll accept Malt Vinegar from the Brits though.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:10:44 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Google says every site &quot;may harm your computer&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article40.html</link>
<description>Google some time ago instituted a feature that will inform you if a search result has been detected as a possible malware source. Perhaps as a sign of Google's network becoming self-aware and trying to protect us from the Internet, as of 9:45am ET this morning Google is tagging ALL SEARCH RESULTS with &quot;This site may harm your computer&quot; and won't let you click through to them. We'll all be part of the Matrix next. Update: Looks like around 10:10am they fixed it...or its trying to hide itself from us...</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:50:57 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Illegal&quot; marketing calls from &quot;Out of Area&quot; - phone spam</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article39.html</link>
<description>They seemed to go away for a bit, but they are back...its those phone calls you get at home, to let you know that your auto warranty is expiring (yeah, in 2 more years), or its your &quot;credit card company&quot; that wants to tell you something, or some other jazz like that. It's a pre-recorded message, which at the end it tells you to press 1 to talk to someone, or press 2 to stop receiving calls. Amazingly, pressing 2 seems to have no effect. So, how do you stop them from calling?
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:50:17 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Doing the New Dews - a taste test of new flavors</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article38.html</link>
<description>Mountain Dew is running a new promotion allowing drinkers to choose the next new flavor of Mountain Dew to go into production. Three new flavors - named Supernova, Voltage and Revolution - are available on shelves across the country and then you can vote for your favorite. We had the opportunity to try all three, so you can read the rest of this article and see how we felt about the three flavors. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:25:37 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Now BVHE won't honor 5 free Blu-Ray offer due to &quot;missing&quot; UPC code</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article37.html</link>
<description>Just not my day today...after a lovely day at work which will end up with me working all night because a customer decided at the last second they don't want to do any of the work, I come home to an envelope from Buena Vista Home Entertainment, the Disney arm that puts out DVD and Blu-Ray discs, and was offering 5 free BD discs (from a limited selection - only one of which I would have actually purchased, mind you) for buying a qualifying Blu-Ray player (like the Playstation 3). My 5 free Blu-Ray discs I'm supposed to get for buying my PS3 has been rejected because they claim I didn't include the UPC symbol. I most definitely DID - I checked several times before sealing the envelope that it was in there, and all I have now is a hole in the box where it was. So what am I supposed to now? They are asking me to send them the UPC code, which I already did, and THEY lost. Sigh...

Update [2/5]: I e-mailed. They said to call. I called. They said to fax...we'll see...

Update [2/23]: Called again today...they apparently &quot;received my request into the system&quot; last week. Only took them 10 days from when I faxed. Supposedly I'm qualified now, but it can be another 5 weeks to receive the discs. We'll see...

Update [3/30]: 5 weeks TO THE DAY of my phone call, the movies arrived - even though a few days ago the web site still listed me as unqualified. At least now I have a couple movies I actually want to watch...</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:31:53 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Moving into the modern world - HDTV</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article36.html</link>
<description>I forgot to mention this - back in October, just before the World Series, I finally broke down and got an HDTV - which would eventually result in the shutdown of my little DirecTV TiVo network, but moving me in to the wonderful world of High Definition.
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:19:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CompUSA clearance sales - not exactly priced to clear</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article35.html</link>
<description>I've dropped by the local CompUSA several times since it was announced that they were sold to a liquidating company, figuring I'd see some good deals. After over a month, most of the discounts are still around 15% - but look closely. It says its off the &quot;original price&quot;. Apparently the original price means the price it had over a year ago, in some cases.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:14:56 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Maybe I don't like Dell any more...</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article34.html</link>
<description>I've always been a fan of Dell hardware - they have great warranties, and the prices are comparable to what it would cost me to build my own, which is what I've done in the past. I'm not a computer newb - I know them inside out. I've installed Linux on a couple thousand Dell servers for a large financial company (no lie). So why is it that I can't convince Dell that there is a defect in this desktop?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:23:54 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Useless technologies - USB key to limit child's computer access</title>
<link>http://www.fleezle.com/log/Article33.html</link>
<description>Japanese toy company Bandai has teamed up with network device maker Buffalo to develop a USB key that prevents children from accessing harmful websites, and limit their computer time. Branded with Disney characters and playing a Disney video when first plugged in, it also limits the programs a child can play. But I wonder if this conversation ever took place:

&quot;So, you plug the USB key in, and the child can only use the computer for what we say they can.&quot;

&quot;Wow, that's kind of neat. But what happens if the key isn't plugged in?&quot;

&quot;Well, then the computer acts normally so the adults can access whatever they want.&quot;

&quot;So, what requires that the key be inserted if the child uses the computer?&quot;

&quot;Ummm...the parent?&quot;

&quot;And what if the child removes the key?&quot;

&quot;Ummm...&quot;

Perhaps it would make more sense if the computer was limited UNLESS the key was inserted, and the parents keep them locked away with their guns and alcohol...
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:03:04 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
